By Vera Wood
Banning social media isn’t the power move our leaders think it is.
Social media can be a mess. It’s loud, chaotic, frequently toxic, and always one step away from a ‘fist fight’ in the comments. But as flawed as it is, it’s also where people talk, connect, organise, and most importantly, speak up.
That’s why it’s so concerning to see governments increasingly choosing to essentially ban ‘the internet’ rather than face the difficult conversations happening online. Instead of addressing criticism or misinformation through education or policies, the go-to move for some leaders has become painfully predictable: ban the app, block the platform, shut it down.
Social media platforms such as TikTok are being used time and time again as an instrument to allow young people to raise their voices about global issues. It’s a tool for visibility and social change.
Australia’s recent moves to regulate and restrict social media platforms is a song we’ve heard sung many times before. These bans are all in the same vein, ‘to prevent misinformation’, but is it stopping the spread of ‘slander’, or just a quick fix? Earlier this year in January, the government of Uganda made the bold decision to suspend public internet access ahead of a high stakes general election. Are these bans and suspensions just a frantic game of whack-a-mole various governments are playing, or is it solving the issue?
Social media bans don’t silence the problems, they just make it harder for the government to hear them, and for the people to talk about. The platforms may be imperfect, but they are essential for young people to express themselves, and raise awareness of issues around the world.
On the other hand, social media can be exceptionally detrimental to a young person’s mind, with over 42% of Australian teens stating that social media negatively affects their mental health. Additionally, social media can be misused by violent youths to express anger, seek attention, and connect with others that share harmful ideas. In certain cases, teens who later commit violent acts, have posted warning signs, such as threats and disturbing messages. But could all of this be solved with healthy regulation, reporting threats and fostering positive online communities? Yes, these violent teens are using social media as a cry for help, and this can all be solved with effective help and support.
At the end of the day, banning social media is the online equivalent of yelling ‘I’m not listening!’ and walking out of the room. Sure, it might give the illusion of control, but it doesn’t solve the real issues hiding underneath the surface.
Before anyone hits the ‘off’ switch, remember: sometimes the loudest noise is actually a call for change. And maybe, just maybe, it’s worth listening to.
